Memorial Day, 2016

Remembering Our Fallen Heroes——————————–      

                By J. F. Kelly, Jr.

Memorial Day honors those who died in active military service. About 1.1 million died in America’s wars, some while performing incredible acts of valor, others simply doing their jobs. All lie beneath the same, simple, white marble headstones, officer and enlisted alike. All are remembered with gratitude for their ultimate sacrifices.

 

World War II, the largest war in my lifetime, claimed about 416,800 American military lives, a tragic loss but a small fraction of the 23,637,900 military deaths suffered by all nations involved. Civilian deaths totaled nearly 34 million, few Americans among them because our homeland was spared the ravages of battle. We should be grateful that our brave veterans fought and died in distant lands in part to keep war far from our shores.

 

That war was fought oceans away, but the effects were deeply felt here at home. The shortages and rationing were a small price to pay toward the war effort. Our greatest concern was the safety of our troops overseas. Nearly everyone had friends or relatives in harm’s way. My eldest brother was one of them, an infantryman in combat in the Southwestern Pacific theatre. He made it back, thin and weak from malaria, but he made it back. Many did not.

 

When weeks would pass without letters, we feared the worst, dreading a telegram that began, “We regret to inform you…” We all knew families that received that telegram. I recall the day my sixth grade classmate received word that his brother was killed in action. We couldn’t believe that he was never coming home, his body now lifeless at the bottom of the Pacific.

 

After that “war to end all wars”, we lost another 50 thousand men in the Korean Conflict, a war that we were ill-prepared to fight at the start because we were so quick to drastically downsize the armed forces after WW II. Many early casualties were attributed to this.

 

Today, our armed forces are again too few and overextended. Reluctant to commit ground troops to combat roles, we rely more on drones, special warfare and the standoff capabilities of naval and air forces. But our ships and aircraft are ageing and there are too few of them. We aren’t building enough of them to sustain even current anemic force levels. We still rely on our mobile Navy/Marine Corps team to maintain presence around the world and provide quick reaction wherever our vital interests are challenged. The challenges are many, particularly in the turbulent Middle East and the South China Sea where China is declaring sovereignty over a huge ocean area through which much of the world’s seagoing commerce passes. Our Navy now is the smallest since the Great Depression. Our nuclear deterrent, moreover, is ageing while Russia and China modernize theirs. The surest way to deter war is and always has been to maintain sufficient strength to discourage any aggression.

 

Past wars were fought mainly by our brothers, sons, husbands and fathers. In future wars, they will be joined in combat by our sisters, daughters, wives and mothers. Our civilian leaders, few of whom have ever experienced combat or, indeed, any military service, should remember this when they commit them to combat.

 

On this Memorial Day, as in the past, we fly the flag proudly and decorate the graves of the fallen. And as we honor their memory and show appreciation for their sacrifices, let us cherish the freedom they paid for with their blood and vow that we never send our men and women into harm’s way without the equipment, numerical strength and rules of engagement they need to get the job done and come home safely.

 

 

(Kelly, a resident of Coronado, is a retired Navy captain who commanded three San Diego-based ships and a naval laboratory. He writes on defense issues. This column appeared originally in The San Diego Union-Tribune on May 28, 2016)

Concerning Cats and Crossroads—————————

                A commentary

                By J. F. Kelly, Jr.

“When you come to a fork in the road, take it.”

                                                                                     —  Yogi Berra

We are indeed at a crossroad in America, faced with a Hobson’s choice of two flawed nominees for president to choose between or abstaining from voting for either. We can take what’s available or get nothing at all. I’m reminded of the words of that wise philosopher-comedian, Woody Allen, who once said, “Mankind is facing a crossroad. One road leads to despair and utter hopelessness and the other to total extinction. I sincerely hope you choose the right road.”

Finding little comfort in this advice, at least at this particular crossroad, I summoned our family cats, Mimi and Mewsetta, who often provide unique perspective on such weighty matters, to a conference at the kitchen table. “I’ll be there in a minute,” Mimi called from the cat box. Mewsetta, her sister, already reclined at table, awoke from a cat nap, yawned, and asked, “Wassup?”

“I need advice,” I said. Trump vs. Clinton presents an impossible choice. As far as I’m concerned, both are badly flawed candidates but I feel it’s my duty as a citizen to vote for president. I’ve never failed to vote for president since I became old enough to vote.”

“Tell me why I should care,” said Mimi. “Well, you’ve never been shy about expressing your opinion in the past,” I replied. “I do cherish your opinion.”

“Here’s an opinion,” Mimi responded. “I think you should clean the cat box more often. Too many clumps.”

“You must not have enough to do, having a conversation with cats,” said my wife from the patio. “If someone heard you, they’d think you were losing it.” Undeterred, I continued. “Many voters are in a quandary,” I said. They won’t vote for Clinton because they feel she exercised bad judgment, if not criminal behavior, in using a private server to conduct State Department business as Secretary of State. Many also fault her for the Benghazi cover-up. Then there are the Clinton fund-raising issues. And some see a Clinton presidency as just a continuation of failed Obama policies.”

“Trump, on the other hand, promises drastic change which he says will be terrific. Problem is, nobody, probably including Trump, actually knows what a Trump presidency would be like. Many Republicans feel he doesn’t represent the party’s values and that he’s really not a conservative at all. He only recently decided to become a Republican. Also, he can be crude and vulgar. He’s been disrespectful to women and he once branded Mexican immigrants as rapists and criminals. He insults those who disagree with him. I feel like I’d be crossing a moral line to vote for him,” I said. “His negatives are very high and his popularity has hit rock bottom lately. It’s gone back up a little recently, but I’m afraid it’s just a dead cat bounce.”

“I don’t appreciate the metaphor,” Mimi hissed. “Sorry,” I said, “but the GOP nominating campaign has been such a cat fight…oops.” “Again with the ugly metaphors?” snarled Mimi.

“It’s just an expression,” I said. “Don’t be so sensitive. Anyway, if I must vote for one or the other, whom should I vote for? Whom would you vote for?” I asked.

“That’s like asking me if I’d rather be mauled by a Pit Bull or a Rottweiler,” Mimi replied.

“I’m going to vote for Clinton. She’s a women and it’s time for a female president,” mewed Mewsetta. “Men have made such a mess of things.”

“You can’t vote, stupid,” growled Mimi. “You’re a cat.” Turning to me, she asked with a sheepish smile, “What do you get when you combine Clinton and Trump? “I haven’t the faintest idea,” I answered. “A clump,” she shouted. Isn’t that hilarious?”

“No,” I responded. “You two have been no help at all.”

“Get down off the table,” my wife ordered, entering the kitchen and shooing the cats. “This meeting is over.”

-30-

 

Feline Philosophers

Concerning Cats and Crossroads—————————

                A commentary

                By J. F. Kelly, Jr.

“When you come to a fork in the road, take it.”

                                                                                     —  Yogi Berra

We are indeed at a crossroad in America, faced with a Hobson’s choice of two flawed nominees for president to choose between or abstaining from voting for either. We can take what’s available or get nothing at all. I’m reminded of the words of that wise philosopher-comedian, Woody Allen, who once said, “Mankind is facing a crossroad. One road leads to despair and utter hopelessness and the other to total extinction. I sincerely hope you choose the right road.”

 

Finding little comfort in this advice, at least at this particular crossroad, I summoned our family cats, Mimi and Mewsetta, who often provide unique perspective on such weighty matters, to a conference at the kitchen table. “I’ll be there in a minute,” Mimi called from the cat box. Mewsetta, her sister, already reclined at table, awoke from a cat nap, yawned, and asked, “Wassup?”

 

“I need advice,” I said. “Trump vs. Clinton presents an impossible choice. As far as I’m concerned, both are badly flawed candidates but I feel it’s my duty as a citizen to vote for president. I’ve never failed to vote for president since I became old enough to vote.”

 

“Tell me why I should care,” said Mimi. “Well, you’ve never been shy about expressing your opinion in the past,” I replied. “I do cherish your opinion.”

 

“Here’s an opinion,” Mimi responded. “I think you should clean the cat box more often. Too many clumps.”

 

“You must not have enough to do, having a conversation with cats,” said my wife from the patio. “If someone heard you, they’d think you were losing it.” Undeterred, I continued. “Many voters are in a quandary,” I said. They won’t vote for Clinton because they feel she exercised bad judgment, if not criminal behavior, in using a private server to conduct State Department business as Secretary of State. Many also fault her for the Benghazi cover-up. Then there are the Clinton fund-raising issues. And some see a Clinton presidency as just a continuation of failed Obama policies.”

 

“Trump, on the other hand, promises drastic change which he says will be terrific. Problem is, nobody, probably including Trump, actually knows what a Trump presidency would be like. Many Republicans feel he doesn’t represent the party’s values and that he’s really not a conservative at all. He only recently decided to become a Republican. Also, he can be crude and vulgar. He’s been disrespectful to women and he once branded Mexican immigrants as rapists and criminals. He insults those who disagree with him. I feel like I’d be crossing a moral line to vote for him,” I said. “His negatives are very high and his popularity has hit rock bottom lately. It’s gone back up a little recently, but I’m afraid it’s just a dead cat bounce.”

 

“I don’t appreciate the metaphor,” Mimi hissed. “Sorry,” I said, “but the GOP nominating campaign has been such a cat fight…oops.” “Again with the ugly metaphors?” snarled Mimi.

 

“It’s just an expression,” I said. “Don’t be so sensitive. Anyway, if I must vote for one or the other, whom should I vote for? Whom would you vote for?” I asked.

 

“That’s like asking me if I’d rather be mauled by a Pit Bull or a Rottweiler,” Mimi replied.

 

“I’m going to vote for Clinton. She’s a women and it’s time for a female president,” mewed Mewsetta. “Men have made such a mess of things.”

 

“You can’t vote, stupid,” growled Mimi. “You’re a cat.” Turning to me, she asked with a sheepish smile, “What do you get when you combine Clinton and Trump? “I haven’t the faintest idea,” I answered. “A clump,” she shouted. Isn’t that hilarious?”

 

“No,” I responded. “You two have been no help at all.”

 

“Get down off the table,” my wife ordered, entering the kitchen and shooing the cats. “This meeting is over.”

May 19, 2016

 

Suicide Bridge

Preventing that Long, Last Leap————————————

                A commentary

                By J. F. Kelly, Jr.

On a recent Saturday evening, the San Diego-Coronado Bridge was closed to traffic again, this time for about four hours because of a person contemplating and then committing an act of suicide by jumping from the span. During this lengthy period, traffic had to be diverted around the Silver Strand inconveniencing thousands of people. And they could consider themselves fortunate for not being stuck on the bridge in their cars while the incident dragged on, as happens often, while police and negotiators try to talk the suicidal person out of jumping. This can take hours, trapping people, including pregnant women, the ill and elderly, without toilet facilities or aid in the event of a medical or other emergency. Police apparently feel compelled sometimes to close all lanes on the bridge because some heartless person would be apt to shout “Jump!”

 

In addition to the inconvenience for thousands of people, the possible health and sanitation issues, the missed appointments and flights, the effects on the environment because of vehicles idling while running air conditioners, plus the wasted fuel and time involved, there is the cost of deploying dozens of police officers and police cars to block access, handle the traffic and attempt to stop the jumper. There is also the cost of counsellors and the expense and trauma of recovering the remains of the jumper from the bay. Coronado is home to a major naval complex and is homeport to two aircraft carriers and numerous other naval commands. Most naval personnel stationed or home-ported in Coronado live elsewhere and rely on the bridge to get to work on time. In the event of a military emergency, bridge closure could become a security issue.

 

Sixteen people died jumping from the bridge last year alone so the annual cost is significant. The greater cost, of course, is the loss of human lives. Life is precious and every suicide is a tragedy, especially if it’s preventable, so we must feel compassion for the tortured souls who feel driven to such a desperate act. Since its opening in 1969, more than 300 people have perished jumping from this bridge making it the third deadliest bridge in the nation. San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge has the dubious distinction of being the deadliest with over 1600 jumping deaths. Not every jump is fatal although most are. Some survive the leap into San Diego Bay, horribly crippled and in pain. Hitting the water from 200 feet is almost like hitting the ground. It is not a pleasant way to end life.

 

For several years, a suicide barrier of some sort has been proposed for the San Diego-Coronado Bridge, perhaps similar to the one that is expected to be in place on the Golden Gate Bridge by 2019. Public opinion, as usual, is divided with one recent survey showing over half the respondents (57%) opposed. Issues include cost and aesthetics with many opponents fearing it would detract from the graceful appearance of the bridge.

 

Also recently, a proposal to provide decorative lighting for the bridge support piers and underside has found favor. The San Diego Unified Port District commissioners have just approved a new policy aimed at raising $8 million for such a project through port tenant construction projects.

 

I’m sure the lighting would be lovely but wouldn’t the money be better spent in deterring suicides, given the cost in human lives, inconvenience to thousands and the annual cost involved in dealing with these tragedies? A barrier fencing system or safety nets could save hundreds of lives and the associated savings would eventually exceed the costs of installation. A barrier fencing system could be decorative but it would, admittedly, detract somewhat from the clean, graceful lines of the bridge. But what matters more, aesthetics or saving lives and the considerable expense of dealing with these frequent incidents?

 

Our bridge, unfortunately, is a suicide magnet. Compassion for the victims is not enough. We must do more to prevent suicides and ensure that this essential transportation link stays open 24/7. If $8 million can be found for decorative lighting, surely a way can be found to erect suicide barriers or netting. Being in the record books for having the third deadliest bridge in the nation is not something for a community to be proud of.

May 15, 2016

How to Lose an Election

Another Opportunity Lost—————————————-

                A commentary

                By J. F. Kelly, Jr.

Donald Trump is the best thing that could have happened to the Democratic Party, to President Obama’s legacy and to his soon-to-be ordained successor, Hillary Clinton. He is the candidate that Mrs. Clinton most wants to face in November because the polls consistently show that she will beat him. The demographics should make this painfully apparent even to Mr. Trump’s most ardent supporters. Both are flawed candidates but she looks like the voice of reason compared to him.

 

A recent Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll shows women voting for Clinton over Trump by 56% to 33%, nearly twice the margin by which they favored Obama over Romney in 2012. All the polls show most Latinos opposed to Trump whose harsh rhetoric on immigration  and comments branding Mexican immigrants as rapists and drug dealers have alienated much of that large and growing segment of the population. Nearly unanimous black support for Mrs. Clinton is largely a given. For all her negatives and brushes with scandal, she probably wins in a landslide, given these demographics, and will carry other Democratic candidates to victory with her.

 

The Republican Party is headed for a train wreck, stuck with a frontrunner who is viewed unfavorably by over two-thirds of the voters and who can’t stop alienating people. If Mr. Trump, who can’t seem to explain his policies in any sort of lucid detail, really wanted to make America great again he should have competed with Mrs. Clinton for the Democratic nomination instead of inflicting himself upon the Republicans. After all, he used to be a Democrat and he supported Democrats candidates like Clinton and John Kerry. Then the Democrats would be stuck with him and the GOP would have another chance to make America great again.

 

The consequences of the GOP losing the general election in November go far beyond failing to regain the White House. With Mr. Trump heading the ticket he will drag down other Republican candidates with him. Republicans may lose the Senate as well, resulting at best in another four years of divided government. So much, then, for sending a message to the political establishment about gridlocked government. Then there are Supreme Court nominations and other senior judicial appointments. A Clinton presidency could result in a Supreme Court stacked with liberal justices who will feel free to re-interpret the Constitution in accordance with progressive ideology.

 

A Trump candidacy will go down in history as the disaster that badly tarnished the Republican brand. It will represent a triumph of anger over judgment and common sense. In order to gain revenge against the party establishment for its perceived failures, Trump supporters, if he wins the nomination as seems likely at this point, will have won a fleeting victory but lost the ultimate prize.

 

Trump’s impressive wins in New York and other eastern states have regained for him the momentum he briefly lost to Sen. Ted Cruz. The Cruz-Kaisich pact is too little and far too late. Trump will almost certainly win enough of California’s huge batch of delegates to get him to the magic 1237 number. The ugly demonstrations against him in California will end up benefitting his campaign because he will use them to justify part of his message about what’s wrong with America. But, of course, the fools who orchestrate violent demonstrations like these are far too ignorant to understand or care about the consequences of their actions. As the reality of a Trump candidacy grows so will his support as establishment Republicans try to make lemonade out of this lemon. Also, Trump reminds us, he hasn’t yet begun in earnest to take on Clinton, so busy has he been insulting his fellow Republicans. And Mr. Trump assures us that he will soon start acting more presidential, get more serious about explaining his policies, seek more expert advice, use a teleprompter rather than shoot from the hip so often, etc.

 

We are told by his friends that there is another, softer side to Donald. You could have fooled me. We are told that he’s a different person on the stump, that he doesn’t really mean all the crazy things he promises while campaigning. So he’s been fooling his supporters as well? They may not be happy about that when they find out. Then there’s the possibility of a damaging FBI report on Clinton’s use of a private server derailing her campaign. Don’t count on it. Nothing like that is going to happen with Loretta Lynch as Attorney-General and Mr. Obama in the White House. A Clinton victory is too important to promoting his legacy.

 

If Republicans can’t find a way to deny Mr. Trump the nomination without provoking him to run as an independent, they can say good bye to another opportunity to regain the White House, keep control of Congress and appoint conservative Supreme Court Justices who won’t re-write the constitution. I’m not at all optimistic regarding their chances.

May 1, 2016